Altered ‘Whistle-Blower’ Application Violates ‘Due Process,’ ‘Presumption of innocence,’ and the Constitution!

I love how these Democrats are now claiming that this President should be impeached because he supposedly violated his oath of office, and I’m also love how the Democrats for the last 3 years have decided that what’s important to the American people is not important to the elected officials who were sent to Washington to do the peoples bidding! For 8 years these Democrats and Republicans had a ring side seat while Obama not only trashed America but sat silent when he took his first international trip to apologize for the American people and this great country’s past actions and then had the gall to declare America not exceptional!

Were the Democrats living up to their obligated ‘Whistle-Blowing’ oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution when Obama violated the Constitution 21 times, delivered $1.5 Billion in cash to Iran in the middle of the night in an unmarked plane, and then carefully choreographed the positioning of the last 4 Administration leaders of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA whose job description was to protect and defend every unconstitutional and illegal action of this corrupt 44th President of the United States, but didn’t?

Dems Lawlessness and attempts to destroy America from within has just taken another turn for the worse! It’s just been uncovered that the document that this ‘Whistle-Blower’s’ used to report their observations have been mysteriously changed! Hmmm, If I were any concerned American citizen I’d be asking by whom, and why?

The Dems would like you to believe that this ‘promise delivering’ President needs to fix the upcoming election to win, and this is after the last 3 years when the Dems ignored the needs of the Country, the American People, and the mandate that was set by the American people’s 2016 mandate to make America great again!

The Dems keep their lies alive by continuing to use half truths, innuendo, fake news, and fake and non existing sources and whistle blowers that never existed, but weaponized for the sole purpose of taking down this duly elected, by the American people President! They are basing their lies on false unsubstantiated accusations to create an unprovable, but protected, false narrative to undermine this duly elected President because they know that these so called ‘reliable’ sources are protected by law from being exposed with their names never being revealed! Now just think about that for a second, especially with this ‘Whistle Blower’ who now has been allowed to file that accusation with no direct knowledge, but only 2nd and 3rd hand biased recollections that can’t be verified by facts or reliable first hand evidence! The problem with all of this is that anyone can be accused of anything that is made up or fabricated! We all witnessed the confirmation hearing of Supreme Court nominee Bret Kavanaugh who was denied his due process and presumption of innocence by Democrats who insisted that because it wasn’t in a court of law that he had to prove his innocents against the 40 year old charges whose accuser didn’t know the when, where, and the who of this 40 year old accusation by a person who made a million dollars on her ‘Go fund me’ page for coming forward! Let’s not forget about the ‘Me too’ movement that destroyed many politicians and Hollywood elitists who were denied their constitutional due process and presumption of innocence!

The phone conversation between President Trump and the newly elected President of Ukraine had to do with assisting AG Barr and his team’s commitment to get to the bottom of the 2016 ‘Russia colluding with the Trump Campaign’ ‘Hoax’ that was, and still is, the Russian Collusion Hoax! Robert Mueller was Obama’s head of the FBI who was, and still is, up to his neck with the sale of 20% of America’s Uranium to Russia, which we now know made its way to Iran!

For all of you out there that think these accusations against this President’s non-existent ‘Quid Pro Quo’ are accurate, then you should be asking yourself about the time line of the accusations against Joe Biden and his ‘Quid Pro Quo’ that he weaponized to protect his son Hunter’s nonexistent expertise that made him millions of dollars! This happened in March of 2016, which was 8 months before the 2016 elections! Biden’s more than obvious ‘Quid Pro Quo’, as can be seen in the clip below, falls under the same time frame that AG Barr swore to investigate the facts behind why the Mueller Investigation’s start, which by coincidence is within the same time frame that Hillary reached out to retired Russian agents to get whatever dirt they could on candidate Donald J. Trump, which in my mind has nothing to do with the 2020 election, but the unfounded accusations of this outsider non-politician who would of had the where with all to even know what he is being accused of doing!

Say it ain’t so Joe! A Creature of Habit That’s Flexing his ‘Quid Pro Quo’ ‘Joe’ muscles again? The biggest Gaffe to Date for Sure!!!!

Biden Campaign Demands TV Executives to Stop Booking Rudy Giuliani On Shows…Or Else

By Beth Baumann

Former Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential campaign on Sunday sent a letter to television executives at ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC, demanding they no longer book Rudy Giuliani on their network. Political anchors Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd and Chris Wallace were also included on the emails. The letter was written by campaign advisers Anita Dunn and Kate Bedingfield, the New York Times reported. 

Giuliani has made the rounds on cable TV, defending President Donald Trump after a full unclassified and unredacted transcript of Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was released. 

During the call, Trump told Zelensky to work with Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr on investigating Hunter Biden’s involvement with a Ukrainian oil company while his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, had dealings with the country. 

Here’s a copy of the letter: 

September 29, 2019

All —

We are writing today with grave concern that you continue to book Rudy Giuliani on your air to spread false, debunked conspiracy theories on behalf of Donald Trump. While you often fact check his statements in real time during your discussions, that is no longer enough. By giving him your air time, you are allowing him to introduce increasingly unhinged, unfounded and desperate lies into the national conversation.

We write to demand that in service to the facts, you no longer book Rudy Giuliani, a surrogate for Donald Trump who has demonstrated that he will knowingly and willingly lie in order to advance his own narrative.

Just today, for example, he tried to resurrect the argument that Vice President Biden’s anti-corruption work in Ukraine was intended to benefit his son, when every single independent outlet has reported that the Vice President Biden was advancing the foreign policy goals of the United States government, the European Union, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and more by pushing to oust a prosecutor who was known to be in contempt.

He also tried to raise completely baseless suggestions about Hunter Biden’s work in China that have been pushed by conservative mouthpiece Peter Schweitzer and have been roundly debunked as false in mainstream outlets. He spouted this while pointedly avoiding answering directly a question about whether he had spoken to Chinese authorities directly in an attempt to manufacture this smear – just as he did with the Ukrainians.

Rudy Giuliani has made clear time and again that he will lie on television – often contradicting himself multiple times over the course of one answer. This morning on CBS, he attacked the credibility of the former Ukrainian prosecutor on whom he has previously staked most of his harebrained case against Biden when the prosecutor said definitively he believed there was nothing here to investigate. Giuliani is not enlightening your viewers in any way. He’s not offering a unique or informed perspective. He’s certainly not introducing new facts, since his relationship with the truth is casual at best.

Giuliani is not a public official, and holds no public office that would entitle him to opine on the nation’s airwaves. The decision to legitimize his increasingly outlandish and unhinged charges and behavior – calling it “news” – rests solely with you. And let us be clear: we do not believe you should be giving legitimacy to someone who has publicly said he is concerned his tombstone will he say he “lied for Donald Trump,” – but if you do, you need to give an equivalent amount of time to a surrogate from the Biden campaign. Vice President Biden and his campaign are the target of these attacks. Saying simply that you will put a Democrat on, at a time when there are many declared candidates for the Democratic nomination for the presidency, is neither fair treatment nor equal treatment.

Your obligation is to provide the American people with an informed, fact-based and responsible coverage and debate of critical issues. Rudy Giuliani has made very clear that his only obligation to protect Donald Trump, and that he will willingly lie to do so. While you have been aggressive in pushing back on him in real time, it is well-known that the dedicated liar always has the advantage, pushing out outlandish falsehoods and disinformation in the knowledge that is hard for the corrections to catch up.

Giving Rudy Giuliani valuable time on your air to push these lies in the first place is a disservice to your audience and a disservice to journalism.

We ask that you no longer book him on your air.

Sincerely, 

Anita Dunn and Kate Bedingfield
Biden for President

Biden Campaign Demands TV News Execs Stop Booking Giuliani  —  In a Sunday letter, the former vice president’s aides say that it is editorially irresponsible to book the president’s personal lawyer.  —  Joe Biden’s presidential campaign made an extraordinary request to executives …
+
Discussion: Fox NewsMother JonesHuffPostSlatetwitchy.comThe Gateway PunditRaw StoryAxiosVarietyThe GuardianThe Last RefugePolitico and Mediaite

President Trump’s comments to the Newly elected President of Ukraine, who by the way won the election by running on a anti corruption platform, not only proves and justifies President Trump’s account and request for assistance to see what started the corruption ‘hoax’ known the ‘Russian Collusion with the Trump Campaign Investigation,’ which we are all now beginning to see had to be by the ‘Deep State’s’ and one time head of the Obama FBI, Robert Mueller and the 18 Top ‘Never Trumper’ lawyers that, after witnessing Mueller testify, had to be just using Mueller’s reputation and name to instill fear in the hearts of every Constitutional believing Americans!

Oh, I almost forgot about this one point that nobody on the Progressive ‘Left’ or the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media points out or wants you, the American people, are intentionally leaving out, and that is back in 1998 America and the Ukraine mutually agreed to the terms of a treaty that would help either country when it came to assisting with any Criminal Matters! I will get into this for you a little later!

See The Evidence Proving Ukraine SHOULD Investigate Hunter Biden

by Jeff Dunetz | Sep 21, 2019 | Crime/Corruption, Politics

The liberals are going nuts because of the claim President Trump asked the Ukrainian President to investigate Hunter Biden for corruption that occurred when he was on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings. The liberals are ignoring many things including that there is plenty of evidence suggesting that there is probable cause for Hunter Biden to be investigated by Ukraine and that his father Joe may have used his position as Vice President to protect his son.

They are also failing to acknowledge the supposed whistleblower had no direct knowledge of the call between Trump and the Ukrainian. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko who does have direct knowledge denied reports that President Trump pressured Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, “I know what the conversation was about, and I think there was no pressure. This conversation was long, friendly, and it touched on many questions, sometimes requiring serious answers.”  And the investigation began before Zelensky was elected on April 21, 2019 (John Solomon wrote about the investigation being started a month earlier), so if anything President Trump was urging Volodymyr Zelensky to keep the investigation going.

A senior member of Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Dept. told John Solomon five months ago, that since last year, he’s been blocked from getting visas for himself and a team to go to the U.S. to deliver evidence of Democratic party wrongdoing during the 2016 election, and Hunter Biden corruption to the DOJ.  The senior prosecutor Kostiantyn Kulyk never got an answer, and he says it’s because the visas were blocked by the U.S. Ambassador. The Ambassador, Marie L. Yovanovitch is a career diplomat (since 1986)  was appointed to her present position in August 2016 by former President Obama and removed by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The attempt to make the Ukrainian Govt. happy and accept the evidence is the reason Guiliani got involved a month ago per John Solomon.

Did you not know, or did the ‘Deep State’ Mainstream Media not bother to tell you that in 1998 there was a Treaty W/Ukraine On Mutual Legal Assistance In Criminal Matters?

The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal
assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in
order to counter criminal activities more effectively. The
Treaty should be an effective tool to assist in the prosecution
of a wide variety of crimes, including drug trafficking
offenses. The Treaty is self-executing. It provides for a broad
range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance
available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or
statements of persons; providing documents, records, and
articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or
identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for
testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches
and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restraint,
confiscation, forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection
of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by
the laws of the requested state.

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge

Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing. Does this sound familiar? How about the Dems telling Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that he had to prove his innocence because the proceeding weren’t considered to be of legal standing because it wasn’t being held in a court of law! Let’s not forget the ‘Me Too’ movement, and like the Bret Kavanaugh inquisition had no interest in allowing our Constitution’s guaranteed ‘presumption of innocence’ or the ‘Due Process’ that every American is guaranteed in America today!

If this Adam Schiff corruption ‘shit’ sticks than anybody will be able to accuse anyone else with anything they want no matter if it’s true or not, and allowed without needing any proof or reasonable cause!

The timing here is far too coincidental.  This was a set-up.

Sean Davis from the Federalist is also hot on the trail.

Sean Davis – Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

**PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE ARTICLES LINKS MIGHT COME UP IN A SMALLER TEXT WINDOW, AND IF THAT’S THE CASE JUST HOLD DOWN THE *CTRL KEY AT THE BOTTOM LEFT OF YOUR KEYBOARD, POINT THE ‘ARROW’ AT THE TEXT, AND THEN USE THE SCROLL WHEEL ON YOUR MOUSE TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE TEXT SO THAT IT IS EASIER TO READ!

The ‘Whistle-Blower application was changed without anyone knowing it, and just by coincidence, the same way that ‘Pelosi supplied altered congressional records to the 2008 election commission!’

The reason Pelosi altered the documents was to show the election committee that Obama was a ‘Natural Born’ citizen, when he wasn’t, which by the way is just one of the Constitutional ‘Common Law’ requirements to be President, and has nothing to do with where he or she is born, but the citizenship of his or her parents! If that wasn’t enough the Dems used what they called the ‘Birther’ issue to accuse whoever threatened their plans to transform America to a New World Order’ Socialist ‘waste land as they did to Venezuela, that just 20 years ago was considered the 4th richest country in the world!

And in the same way that they passed Obamacare by using the same ‘nuclear option,’ which is just a simple majority of 51 votes that was only meant to be used to resolve Budget issues, but never for passing legislation or confirming Judges and Justices, which is what the Dems Senate Majority leader Harry Reid who after leaving congress has got to wishing he didn’t set the Precedent, but felt confident in his decision because he thought, or hoped in his mind, that Hillary was going to win the election and that his decision would never come back to hurt himself or the Democrats, unfortunately his gamble didn’t pay off and the Trump Administration is using the same ‘Nuclear Option’ to fill the lower courts with the most Constitutionally minded justices and judges in the history of America!

HOW OBAMACARE BECAME THE “LAW OF THE LAND”

New 3/12/2016 exchange enrollment data released by the Obama administration on Friday reveal in multiple ways that Obamacare is failing to live up to its goal of providing affordable care.

That’s no small problem when the law mandates that people buy coverage or face a fine. The fact that enrollment grew only modestly in the law’s third year despite the ramping up of the mandate penalty underscores the reality that Obamacare only offers poor options to far too many millions of people.

The Department of Health and Human Services also revealed that the exchanges ended 2015 with just under 8.8 million paid enrollees nationwide, down 25% from the 11.7 million sign-ups to start the year. As of last March, once the unpaid total was culled, there were 10.2 million members.

SO HOW DID OBAMACARE BECOME A LAW? IT’S ACTUALLY PRETTY INTERESTING, BUT UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL, AND UNDERMINING THE INTENT AND INTERPRETATION OF OUR FOUNDER’S CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!

If you recall, the Democrats in the House weren’t able to pass their version of a Healthcare law. Because all revenue bills have to originate in the House of Representatives, the Senate found a bill that met those qualifications: HR3590, a military housing bill. They took out essentially all of the wording of it, and turned it into the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare. It gets better. The Senate at that time had 60 Democrats, just enough to pass Obamacare.

After the bill passed the Senate, the Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy died. In his place, Massachusetts elected Republican Scott Brown. That meant that, if the House made any changes to the bill, the Senate wouldn’t have the necessary number of votes to pass the corrected bill, since they knew no Republicans would vote for Obamacare. So they made a deal with the Democrat‐controlled House of Representatives: the House would pass the Senate bill without any changes, IF the Senate agreed to pass a separate bill by the House that made changes to the Senate version of Obamacare. This second bill was called the Reconciliation Act of 2010.

It made a bunch of detail changes, and added some things. So the House passed PPACA, the Senate bill, as well as their Reconciliation Act. So now PPACA was ready for the President to sign, but the Senate still needed to pass the Reconciliation Act from the House. Confused yet?

Now, remember that the Senate only had 59 votes to pass the Reconciliation Act since Republican Scott Brown replaced Democrat Ted Kennedy. In order to pass the Reconciliation Act, therefore, the Democrats in the Senate DECIDED TO CHANGE THE RULES!

They declared that they could use the “Reconciliation Rule”—this is a different “reconciliation” than the House bill now. This rule was only used for budget item approval so that budget items could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60 required for other and more important legislation. This rule was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare, or appointing Judges and Justice which has now backfired on the Senate Majority leader Harry Reid and his boss, Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States! Talk about jumping the gun, Harry Reid and Obama thought that Hillary would be a shoe in over outsider non-politician candidate Donald J. Trump, and that by changing the voting rules in the Senate to the simple majority of 51 votes (Nuclear Option) instead of the normal 60 votes being needed, that they could finish off the Republican Party, our founder’s Constitution, the ‘Rule of Law,’ but most of all ignoring the needs and wants of the American people!

Unfortunately for the Pelosi and Schumer led Democratic Socialist Party, and with the American people giving congress an approval grade of 12.8% before the 2016 elections! It appears now, with hindsight being 20:20, that the Dems overplayed their hand, and because of that set a precedent that the Republicans, who never were supposed to be occupying the White House, let alone the Senate and the House at the time, would appoint the most Constitutional minded judges and justices by any President’s Administration in history! That is until the ‘backed into a corner’ Dems were forced to use voter fraud to take back the House or become another addition to the long list of species that have been declared extinct!’

When it came to the passage of Obamacare and how it was unconstitutionally passed they said too bad and used the ‘Nuclear Option’ anyway. It was passed by both the Democratic Majority in the House and Senate and then signed by President Obama!

What the American people also need to know is that lowering the criteria from the 60 votes needed to pass important legislation to only 51! This action undermines not only the filibuster, but undermines the important differences between our Republic and the Democrats who are continuing on with their false narrative of preaching about defending our ‘Democracy’ when we have always been a Republic, which is a huge difference!

Key Takeaways: Republic vs. Democracy!

  • Republics and democracies both provide a political system in which citizens are represented by elected officials who are sworn to protect their interests.
  • In a pure democracy, laws are made directly by the voting majority leaving the rights of the minority largely unprotected.
  • In a republic, laws are made by representatives chosen the people and must comply with a constitution which specifically protects the rights of the minority from the will of the majority.

WHEN IT COMES TO OBAMACARE, IT WAS ALL DONE BY DEMOCRATS WITHOUT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT. TO QUOTE DEMOCRAT REP. ALCEE HASTINGS OF THE HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE DURING THE BILL PROCESS:

“WE’RE MAKING UP THE RULES AS WE GO ALONG” THEY CERTAINLY COULDN’T HAVE MADE THIS LAW WITHOUT IT.

HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT?????

I think it’s time for ‘America to recognize what’s going on with the Branch of the Democratic Party that no longer comes close to resembling our father and mother’s Democratic Party, especially when it comes to the willingness to work through bipartisanship and respecting the opposition Party when our founder’s blueprint for American was strictly adhered to!

The Dems have already subpoenaed their first witness for their newly and inspired Russian collusion 2.0, a.k.a the Ukraine collusion to influence and election, by subpoenaing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for documents related to President Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which he requested that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. I think we know with what we’ve seen before with the Mueller Investigation, and what the Dems hope will happen again so that they can claim another cover up, that those documents will be classified to be protected under ‘Executive Privilege’ and as a result, and as I mentioned earlier, will give the Dems another opportunity to cry wolf by using their finely tuned art of innuendo by declaring all of it a cover up!

If you recall it was Eric Holder that got nailed for his contempt of Congress, and all because he refused to answer questions aimed at his part in Fast and Furious’ a gun running scheme that he orchestrated! I think we now know why though, and that’s because it was just revealed that ‘Fast and Furious’ was more about protecting Iran’s drug running money making agenda into America so that the Obama Administration could lock up their ‘Nuclear Deal’ with Iran that the Obama Administration was trying to secure from Obama first day in office!

Don’t you think that this would be another example of the Obama Administration, like Vice President Joe Biden with Ukraine, using the Dems patented use of ‘Quid pro Quo’ again while the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media stays silent and not even bothering to inform the American People of the corrupt actions by the Obama Administration! I would have to believe that this just happens to be just a little more threatening to our National Security than does this ‘Whistle-Blower’ who had no first hand knowledge, but showed America just how corrupt and desperate Adam Schiff and the ‘Deep State’ has to be by having to alter the ‘Whistle Blower’ application form to allow ‘here say’ to be used, where in this land and in any court of law would have been thrown out of every court by every judge every time its been used as evidence! Oh, I almost forgot, that might not be thrown out of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals where 80% of the rulings that come out of that Court are reversed by the Supreme Court!!

DID HARRY REID’S ‘NUCLEAR OPTION’ HELP THE PARTY OF ‘NO’ RESHAPE THE COURTS FOR A GENERATION?