The ‘Fake Polls’ were wrong about the expected coronation of Hillary Clinton, but were right, but not heeded by this Ex anti-American President, Barack ‘Insane’ Obama when 70% of America didn’t want to do the deal with Iran, and look where we are today!
The ‘fake polls’ that are paid for to set a negative agenda, like politicians, are only good for one thing, and that’s the paper the results are printed on, a.k.a. toilet paper, because 90% of the time it’s all sh*t that needs to be wiped away and then flushed down the toilet!
What you have understand is that when there are no sources to back up the agenda journalist’s lie, they produce a fake poll to cover their tracks to make it appear that their lie is honestly factual, which we already know it’s not, and that’s because we all weren’t born yesterday, and have been around the political block of few times!
The ‘Paid to Report’ Media of both print and visual have led Americans’ not only astray, but down a path of psychological intolerance, nonacceptance, and bitterness toward their fellow man, and all created by Obama’s mentor, Saul Alinsky, and his 8 points to ‘A Better Life Through Socialism’s’ claim to fame!
When you have such a ‘Huuuuge’ effort by the ‘Mainstream Stream Media’ of constantly lying, using innuendos, and half-truths to manufacture a narrative that’s only accepted by the ones who’ve fallen under the spell of what Nazi Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it,” then you know that any Democrat or Republican who votes against something that is good for all Americans, but chooses to find one negative criticism of the massive tax bill to hang his hat on, and not the positive benefits that outweigh his pettiness, then he’s not doing the job he was sent to Washington to do!
I guess you can look at the 90% of bad press for the last 3 months is not as bad of Obama erasing 50 years of Martin Luther King’s accomplishments of mending the fences between white and black in America,
but with the greatest economic boom that’s occurring in America today, you would have to think that the 90% number might be just another wish by the ‘the fix is in’ Progressive Left before the 2018 midterms! ~~~~
Study 90% Of Trump Coverage in Last 3 Months Has Been Negative
The mainstream media’s bias against President Donald Trump may be even worse than was previously thought, according to a new report.
A study released Tuesday by the Media Research Center reveals that more than 90 percent of statements about Trump made on the ABC, NBC and CBS evening broadcasts by reporters and nonpartisan sources in the last three months were negative.
The media’s hostile approach to covering the Trump administration has been documented by the media watchdog group, whose goal, according to its website, is “to expose and neutralize the propaganda arm of the Left: the national news media.”
“As the Media Research Center has been documenting all year, the media have approached the Trump presidency with unrelenting hostility,” MRC director of research Rich Noyes wrote in his analysis of the study.
The study shows that in September, there were only 31 pro-Trump statements and 359 negative statements on the ABC, NBC and CBS broadcasts. In October, there were 41 positive statements on the “Big Three” evening newscasts, but the number of negative statements grew to 435.
There seemed to be a decrease in statements overall about Trump in November, with the MRC citing the coverage of the allegations against Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore as a possible explanation. Out of the 353 statements about Trump in November 33 were positive and 320 were negative.
With the events of this past week, it is clear that the White House and the media do not get along.
It’s always been strained, but now, can the press even give — the president says the press won’t ever give me a fair shake,” MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle said on her Nov. 27 show, according to NewsBusters. “But can it give him a fair shake when he calls them fake news day in and day out?”
“Wait a minute here! The ‘Paid to Report’ Media caused those comments that were aimed at them way before Donald J. Trump even started his deserved verbal attacks, and with the proof that the Obama Administration contracted the Washington Post to the tune of some $600 Million dollars to attack President Trump at every turn, is just something that has not been reported on by by these agenda journalists who have made every penny count!”
On Monday, for example, White House press secretary Sarah Huckleberry Sanders went head-to-head with CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta during a news briefing.
“A number of outlets have had to retract and change and rewrite and make editor’s notes to a number of different stories,” she said. “Some of them with major impacts including moving markets. This is a big problem.”
Acosta responded to her statement by claiming that “journalists make honest mistakes, and that doesn’t make them fake news.”
The CNN correspondent then tried to interrupt Sanders mid-question, to which the press secretary interjected, “I am sorry — I am not finished.”
“You cannot say that it’s an honest mistake when you’re purposely putting out information that you know to be false or when you’re taking information that hasn’t been validated, that hasn’t been offered any credibility, and that has been continually denied by multiple people including people with direct knowledge of an incident,” Sanders added.
Trump, for his part, has accused CNN and other mainstream media outlets of spreading fake news. CNN has received significant criticism lately for its coverage of Trump.
The network ran a segment Monday about how Trump reportedly drinks 12 Diet Cokes every day. The segment aired during the same time other news organizations were covering the attempted terror attack in New York City.
On Friday, the network published a story falsely claiming that Donald Trump Jr. had early knowledge of Democratic National Committee emails obtained by WikiLeaks. After public outcry over the error, CNN was forced to correct the story.
According to an MRC study from earlier this year, as of August 31, there had been nearly 74 hours of coverage of the Trump administration during the “Big Three” evening newscasts. In comparison, in all of 2015 and 2016, the Obama administration only received 59 hours of coverage.
The analysis of this heavy coverage showed that the goal “is not to promote the President, but to punish him.”
“Even as the media whine about Trump, their hostile coverage shows no let up,” Noyes wrote in his analysis if the MRC’s most recent study.
“Our study of news in June, July and August found an identical rate of 91 percent negative coverage — which means TV news is unchanged in its hostility toward the president.”
~~The Liberty Eagle
