President Trump’s Foreign Policy under attack for not representing what the last 4 Administrations chose to hide from the American people! What the American people need to know before falling for this false narrative of how dangerous this President is when it comes to rejection the Foreign policy that started with Bush 41, and how that Foreign policy called for the American ‘sheeple’ to march willingly to the ‘Left’s’ new ‘We Are the World’ National Anthem, and doing it without seeking the approval from the American people!
What President Trump is doing when it comes to Foreign Policy is ‘Winning, Winning, and Winning, and after Obama started ISIS with Hillary as his Secretary of State, Hillary’s State Department losing or misplacing $6 Billion dollars with an additional $400 Million dollars worth of weaponry that the Obama White House admits was accidentally given to ISIS, and then Obama balking on the commitment he made in the name of the American people to strike back if Syria’s Russian backed leader Assad gassed his people again while Obama looked the other way and did nothing!
Obama, when asked by Ukraine for assistance to fight the Russians sent Blankets while President Trump sent the weapons they asked for! Obama is the one that paid Iran $150 billion to Iran with $1.7 Billion in cash delivered in the middle of night with some for releasing hostages (against American Foreign Policy paying anything for hostages) with the rest used for financing terrorism over using that money to help his own people! How can we forget how Obama told the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations to not defend Israel, America’s most trust worthy and loyal Ally in the Middle East for years, but with the U.N. Adopting resolution 2334 (2016) by 14 votes, with the United States abstaining, the Council reiterated its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem…
Is this he Foreign Policy that the ‘Left’ is claiming President Trump isn’t following? Hmmmm…
Foreign Policy under the Obama Administration gave us a military that was shrunk to the size of WWII with the Navy shrinking further to a level not seen since WWI!
If this is what the ‘Deep State’ Mainstream Media and the Progressive Left believes is what America’s Foreign Policy should be, and then blame this ‘Make America Great Again,’ President after they ignored the American Peoples Congressional approval rating of 12.8% before the 2016 elections, and then missed the fact that 63 Million People didn’t agree with their Socialist New World Order platform, then the only thing left to say to these Dems is for them to keep swinging for the fences with an agenda that is in no way, unless they pull that ‘Voter Fraud’ out of their hat that they used in 2012 and then in 2018 to take back the House, which I wouldn’t put past them, then they should know after 2016 that there will be a much bigger ‘Silent Majority’ that will include more Democrats that know this Impeachment Inquiry is taking away from the work that’s needed to be addressed by Congress for the American people!
Democrats haven’t addressed any of America’s concerns for the last 3 years, and this has been a reality for the Democrats since Inauguration day back in January 2017 when 60 Democratic members of Congress didn’t bother to even show up for what was supposed to be the smooth transition of power! Let’s not forget how easy it was for the ‘Deep State’ Mainstream Media not to waste any time by starting to write about impeaching this promise delivering President!
Here are some more Obama Administration’s ‘Foreign Policy’ to think about before voting in 2020, and what President Trump is changing for the better!
I know this might not sound like Foreign Policy but if you’re going to tax and regulate the hell out of our American made companies so that they have to relocate somewhere else in the world, and that relocating takes away from America’s GDP, American jobs, but adds to the new host nations GDP and jobs, then I would say that Obama’s ‘Foreign Policy’ is not only front and center but on the hook when it comes to redistributing America’s wealth to ‘foreign’ nations!
OBAMA PROMISED TO DISMANTLE OUR ARMED FORCES BACK IN 2010!
Obama Promised to Dismantle Our Armed Forces back in 2010, and for his whole reign of terror has destroyed our position in the world, and our allies!
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barrack Obama outlining his plans for America’s national defense. Obama’s presentation demonstrates either total naiveté about important national security programs or he is just pandering for votes among the extreme left.
“I’m the only major candidate to oppose this war from the beginning and as president I will end it.” No one likes war: especially those who must do the fighting and dying. Yet, our military leaders make clear that the consequences of a rapid withdrawal from Iraq as Obama seeks would be disastrous not only for American interests in the region but for Iraq itself. It would provide a propaganda victory for al Qaeda and Iran because they will be able to claim they defeated America. Further, it could worsen the Iraqi civil war, create an unstable Mideast and further spike oil prices.
“Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.” Anyone who has worked with the military for any length of time knows there is waste, often in weapons systems. Recently, the government Accountability Office found that 95 major weapons systems — including the Joint Strike Fighter and the Littoral Combat Ship — have exceeded their original budgets. These cost overruns could be the result of waste or mismanagement or, perhaps, the development and fielding of sophisticated new weapons with constantly changing requirements is difficult and inefficient.
“I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems”
“I will not weaponize space.”
“I will slow our development of future combat systems.”
“… and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.”
“To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons.” That’s dangerous.
“I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material…” Nations capable of producing nuclear weapons produce fissile material for their atomic arsenals.
“… and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair trigger alert…”
“… and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.”
Senator Obama’s national security views expressed in his 52-second video reflect that of a knee-jerk liberal academic who thinks that the US is the primary threat to world peace. His views are dangerously naive, and his statements suggest a shallow understanding of national security issues and in some cases his facts are wrong!
Obama called ISIS the JV Team, told us they were on the run, and continually, with the help of John Kerry, lied to the American people for the sake of his own legacy!
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE ACTUALLY GETTING INTEL ON ISIS BEING COOKED BY ANALYSTS’ SUPERIORS TO MAKE OBAMA LOOK GOOD!~~~
4 Administrations, and 27 years later the bipartisan attempt to shove a New World Order down the Throats of the American people has been thwarted by an outsider non-politician President who had enough of the ‘Deep State’ and their plans to destroy America from within!
This President watched from the top of that non-committal fence for years, and as a result developed an opinion of what was happening in America and to the American people, but also observed what was happening in world as a result of our founder’s experimenting in a government that was created ‘By the People and for the People’ when the rest of the world were being ruled not by the people, but by the hand-me down blood line controlling dictators, emperors, Kings and Queens, chiefs, and even Gods that were supposedly heaven sent, but after years of watching ‘Ancient Aliens’ have adjusted my thinking to what was supposed to be ‘Heavenly sent!’
Businessman Trump, out of a need to survive in that dog eat dog high end property development industry in New York City and the rest of the world that he was competing in, and as a result needed to play both sides of the aisle in order to to protect his best interests! Businessman Trump who needs permits, licences, and ordinances in order to build one of his many projects can’t afford ‘not’ to donate to both sides of the political aisle! He also couldn’t play favorites because it would eliminate 50% of his potential business clients, and as a probably would have been down graded to that of only a half Billionaire Businessman instead of the Billionaire Businessman we know today!
Along with those donations to both sides of the aisle came that ‘something for something else’ ‘Quid Pro Quo’ using information that made him privy to what our elected officials were doing in those smoked filled back rooms up on Capitol Hill! He accumulated a lot of information about the plans that our elected officials were making for America’s future, and the future of the American people! What’s curious here is that starting back as far as the Bush 41 Administration back in 1992 they were using Climate Change as a ‘Fear Factor’ rallying point that the Dems thought would make the American people come willingly into the welcoming arms of the New World Order cabal, even if it meant they would have to give up some if not most of our founder’s Constitutionally guaranteed individual rights that every American enjoys, and what the rest of the world has never tasted!
Agenda 21 is a two-decade old, grand plan for global ’Sustainable Development,’ brought to you from the United Nations. George H.W. Bush (and 177 other world leaders) agreed to it back in 1992, and in 1995, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order #12858, creating a Presidential Council on ‘Sustainable Development.’ This effectively pushed the UN plan into America’s large, churning government machine without the need for any review or discussion by Congress or the American people.
‘Sustainable Development’ sounds like a nice idea, right? It sounds nice, until you scratch the surface and find that Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development are really cloaked plans to impose the tenets of Social Justice/Socialism on the world.
At risk from Agenda 21;
•Private Property ownership
•Single-Family homes
•Private car ownership and individual travel choices
•Privately owned farms
The Agenda 21 plan openly targets private property. For over thirty-five years the UN has made their stance very clear on the issue of individuals owning land;
Land… cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society.
Source: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I), Vancouver, BC, May 31 – June 11, 1976. Preamble to Agenda Item 10 of the Conference Report.
There are two more, very good reasons to be wary of Agenda 21 and the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) that supports it: George Soros and the United Nations. Soros money has been tracked to funding parts of ICLEI;
In 1997, George Soros’s Open Society gave ICLEI a $2,147,415 grant to support its Local Agenda 21 Project
As regards the UN, that organization’s problems with America’s appreciation of freedom and self-determination is one that needs no explanation.
Currently in California, Agenda 21 is working to implement plans to create plans for sustainable management of ‘open spaces.’ The definition of what is to be considered an ‘open space’ has sparked some heated exchanges between those directing the planning meetings and citizens who want private property rights to be respected and protected.
This type of global plan could not be implemented without a large and well-funded group pushing through its priorities. For that, Agenda 21 has the ‘International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives’ (ICLEI). And ICLEI is deeply entrenched in America;
ICLEI USA was launched in 1995 and has grown from a handful of local governments participating in a pilot project to a solid network of more than 600 cities, towns and counties actively striving to achieve tangible reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and create more sustainable communities. ICLEI USA is the domestic leader on climate protection and adaptation, and sustainable development at the local government level.
Over six hundred cities, towns and counties in America are members of ICLEI? Do you support your local government agreeing to rules and regulations set up by a UN-based organization that wants private property transferred to government control? If you would like to see if your community is a member of ICLEI, you can visit their website.
Austin, Texas is one city that seems to have fallen for the ICLEI/Agenda 21 and was heavily consuming the ‘Communitariasm’ Kool-aid. A local group called Texans For Accountable Government saw what was happening and attempted to stop the Austin City Council from adopting some Agenda 21-friendly initiatives. One of TAG’s members, John Bush, delivered a succinct presentation on ICLEI and Agenda 21 that was virtually ignored. Watch his short argument against the proposed local law immediately followed by the lopsided vote adopting the plan.
In the world of business Agenda 21 is not a free market friend, preferring PPPs or Private Public Partnerships where the government decides which companies will receive tax breaks and can stay in business. Considering this realization, the cozy relationship between the current administration and GE (a company that paid no tax in 2010) should raise eyebrows. And the WH efforts to tell Boeing in which state they can operate seems to further bolster the belief that Agenda 21 ideals are already making headway in America.
The seeds for Agenda 21 were planted back in 1987 when the writings of Gro Harlem Brundtland (a woman who was first Vice-President of the Socialist International) caught the eye of the UN. Dr. Brundtland wrote a report for the UN called, ‘Our Common Future’ eventually got into the business of environmentalism as a tool to control all the people of the world and establish a global government. The growth of ICLEI and the framework being put in place by supporters of Agenda 21 appear to be bringing Dr. Brundtland’s ideas closer to reality
In recent months, citizen groups across the country have organized and become involved in the removal of towns and cities from membership in ICLEI. The Roanoke, VA Tea Party is holding a rally this week to have ICLEI removed from their local government.
For a better understanding of Agenda 21 and ICLEI we suggest: The American Policy Center offers a one-page primer on Agenda 21.
‘Agenda 21: The U.N. Conspiracy That Just Won’t Die’
~ Caitlin Dickson, updated 07.12.17, Published 04.13.14
In a new report, the Southern Poverty Law Center deconstructs the mythology that has surrounded the sustainability planning program since it was adopted at the U.N. Earth Summit more than 20 years ago.
It’s been called “the most dangerous threat to American sovereignty”; “An anti-human document, which takes aim at Western culture, and the Judeo-Christian and Islamic religions,” that will bring “new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind,” and “abolish golf courses, grazing pastures and paved roads,” in the name of creating a “one-world order.”
It’s been the subject of several forewarning books and DVDs; there are organizations dedicated to stopping it and politicians have been unseated for supporting it. Glenn Beck has spent a good portion of his career making people scared of it.
Not sure what it is? You’re not alone.
The Daily Beast got a sneak peek at a new report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit civil rights group, which deconstructs the mythology of Agenda 21 and the organizations, individuals, and even elected officials who’ve spent years promulgating the conspiracy theory surrounding it.
Before diving into the fiction that has inflated Agenda 21 to fear-mongering status, we must first understand the facts. What, exactly, is Agenda 21?
While the name might sound a bit ominous, Agenda 21 is a voluntary action plan that offers suggestions for sustainable ways local, state and national governments can combat poverty and pollution and conserve natural resources in the 21st century. (That’s where the ’21’ comes from. Get it?) 178 governments—including the U.S. led by then-President George H.W. Bush—voted to adopt the program which is, again, not legally binding in any way, at the 1992 U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro.
It wasn’t long after Agenda 21 was introduced that right-wing opposition began to swirl. The SPLC points to Tom DeWeese as one of the first pounce on the U.N. plan. In 1998 DeWeese founded the American Policy Center, a group based in Remington, Va., that focuses on “environmental policy and its effect on private property rights” and “the United Nations and its effect on American national sovereignty.” The SPLC report quotes DeWeese as describing Agenda 21 as a “blueprint to turn your community into a little soviet,” promoted by non-governmental organizations that pressure governments to enforce it. According to DeWeese, “It all means locking away land, resources, higher prices, sacrifice and shortages and is based on the age-old socialist scheme of redistribution of wealth.”
DeWeese has continued to deride the dangers of Agenda 21 well into the 21st Century, making appearances on Fox News and fitting in nicely with the Tea Party movement. The American Policy Center was just the first of many anti-Agenda 21 organizations to spring up in the past 15 or so years and the SPLC points out the 11 most pervasive.
To those who don’t closely follow the carrying on of fringe conspiracist, Glenn Beck might be the most recognizable face of the modern Anti-21 movement. Particularly during his reign at Fox News, Beck used his cable TV soapbox to scare his loyal viewers.
“Those pushing…government control on a global level have mastered the art of hiding it in plain sight and then just dismissing it as a joke,” the SPLC quotes Beck saying around 2011 while waving a copy of the 294-page Agenda 21 document on his show. “Once they put their fangs into our communities and suck all the blood out of it [sic], we will not be able to survive.”
Never one to miss an opportunity to cash on in people’s fears, Beck published a dystopian science fiction novel in 2012 called Agenda 21, about a version of America where mating partners are arranged, children are raised away from their parents in group homes, and the book’s heroine spends hours walking on a sort of treadmill that generates energy in an apartment in a planned community. In the book’s afterword, Beck warns, “[I]f the United Nations in partnership with radical environmental activists and naive local governments get their way, then the themes explored in this novel may start to look very familiar, very quickly.”
But while Glenn Beck can technically be dismissed as nothing more than a fringe figure, a conspiratorial talking head—no matter how large his audience may be—the elected officials who have taken a similarly strong stance against Agenda 21 cannot. In the report, the SPLC points out Newt Gingrich, who said he would “explicitly repudiate” the plan if elected president during his 2012 White House bid; Oklahoma Sen. Sally Kern and Arizona state Sen. Judy Burges who both introduced anti-Agenda 21 legislation that ultimately failed; and former Georgia Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers, who “organized a four-hour, closed-door anti-Agenda briefing in October 2012” during which “attendees were told President Obama was using ‘mind control’ techniques to push land use planning, and that the U.N. planned to force Americans from suburbs into cities and also was implementing mandatory contraception to curb population growth.” U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has claimed that Agenda 21 sought to abolish “golf courses, grazing pastures, and paved roads.”
And as recently as 2012, the SPLC writes, the Republican National Committee’s platform included the line, “We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty.”
Several anti-Semitic, neo-Nazi groups have also jumped on the anti-Agenda 21 bandwagon, seizing the opportunity to blame the controversial document on none other than the Jews.
“Antisemitism is basically a conspiracy theory,” the American Jewish Committee’s Ken Stern told the SPLC. He explains how neo-Nazis have linked Agenda 21 to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a falsified document that is alleged to reveal a secret Jewish plot to take over the world. “It’s Jews conspiring to harm non-Jews, and that conspiracy explains a lot of what goes wrong with the world,” Stern said.
To be sure, not all of Agenda 21’s opponents are on the far right of the political spectrum. The group Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21 hosted a conference on the plan in California in 2011. Its founder, self-described lesbian feminist Rosa Koire,” wrote the book Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, which claims the plan will ultimately lead to the U.S.’s economic demise.
In fact, the anti-Semitic crowd’s interest in the Agenda 21 conspiracy theory sort of explains why it appeals to all its followers, regardless of political leanings.
“Any time you get some sort of UN program that suggests any kind of change in the way people live, even if it seems outwardly benign and even voluntary, it’s going to be taken up by people with a conspiracist bent,” Michael Barkun, a Syracuse University political scientist and scholar of conspiracy theories, told the SPLC.
At this point in the explanation, it bears asking whether any of this matter. Is the federal government—or any state or local subsidiaries—even considering implementing any of the plan’s suggestions for sustainable development? The SPLC report states plainly: “For all the agitation, it’s not clear.” 98 percent of people who responded to a June 2012 poll by the American Planning Association said they didn’t know enough about Agenda 21 to support or oppose it. Six percent said they were against it, while nine percent stated that they were in favor, but move ahead the 27 years since the inception of the idea of Agenda 21 and you’ll find that the Democrats are using it’s original ‘Blueprint’ to push their Socialist Globalist Open Border agenda, and the AOC inspired ‘Green New Deal! ~~
