Our founders were not only wise men, but they knew that one day their ‘We the Peoples’ ‘Constitutional Republic’s Constitution would be challenged, so what they did was set up a way, a Constitutional way to Amend the Constitution, and none of the following calls for the blatant attempt, a.k.a., Pelosi and Schumer led continuation of the 8 years that the Obama and Biden Administration intentionally violated the constitution via piecemeal as they continue to do today, as proven by Biden’s now threatening speech that he actually thinks is going to force the American people to cave to the demands of the world which needs to start immediately with eliminating the 1st and 2nd Amendments, and the right to due Process!
If Biden is so convinced that BIG’ Government is ‘We the People,’ then why aren’t ‘We the People’ being trusted to make the right decisions when it comes to the direction of America’s future instead of the Pelosi and Schumer led ‘Radical Left’ pushing to ‘Pack’ the Court, killing the filibuster, getting rid of the ‘Electoral College,’ opening the border, defunding the police, and targeting and dismantling our military are their top priorities?
Now let’s think about this for a moment, and then ask ourselves that if ‘We the People’ wanted what the progressive/Radical Left was selling that they would have voted for it, and if Pelosi and Schumer believed ‘We the People’ would vote for their agenda why would they have to even consider introducing H.R.1 which is a bill that the House passed that is the building block for a ‘Blue’ nation!
Update: Proof that America’s 2020 election stolen!!
How to Amend the Constitution.
Article V of the Constitution itself establishes the two ways in which it may be amended:
“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.“
In simple terms, Article V prescribes that amendments may be proposed either by the U.S. Congress or by a Constitutional Convention when and if demanded by two-thirds of the legislatures of the states!
Article V of the Constitution itself establishes the two ways in which it may be amended:
Method 1: Congress Proposes an Amendment
An amendment to the Constitution may be proposed by any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate and will be considered under the standard legislative process in the form of a joint resolution.
In addition, as ensured by the First Amendment, all American citizens are free to petition Congress or their state legislatures to amend the Constitution.
To be approved, the amending resolution must be passed by a two-thirds supermajority vote in both the House and the Senate.
Given no official role in the amendment process by Article V, the president of the United States is not required to sign or otherwise approve the amending resolution. Presidents, however, typically express their opinion of proposed amendments and may attempt to persuade Congress to vote for or against them.
Method 2: The States Demand a Constitutional Convention
Under the second method of amending the Constitution prescribed by Article V, if two-thirds (currently 34) of the state legislatures vote to demand it, Congress is required to convene a full constitutional convention.
Just as in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, delegates from every state would attend this so-called “Article V Convention” for the purpose of proposing one or more amendments.
Though this more momentous method has never been used, the number of states voting to demand a constitutional amending convention has come close to the required two-thirds on several occasions. The mere threat of being forced to surrender its control of the constitutional amendment process to the states has often prompted Congress to preemptively propose amendments itself.
What comes next is the work an editing by the ‘Mainstream Media’ and ‘Big Tech’ to make it sound like there are 5 other ways that aren’t mentioned in the Constitution when it comes to Amending the Constitution that these ‘Never America First or Great Again” naysayers want you to believe, and that’s so when both Mitch McConnell, when he had the power, who did nothing as either Senate Minority Leader or Majority Leader to block any of the Obama and Biden Administration from so easily violating the Constitution with not an ounce of Pushback, especially now being verified by his trying to be hidden by the Mainstream Media and Big Tech’ huge financial and family ties to Communist China!
Now remember these five unofficial yet legal ways of changing the Constitution aren’t mentioned and interpreted to be ‘possible legal’ ways, but again not mentioned in the Constitution are used more often—and sometimes even more controversially—than the Article V amendment process. These include legislation, presidential actions, federal court rulings, actions of the political parties, and simple custom.
Now lets break those down!
The first includes legislation:
Now does that mean legislation that the Harry Reid ‘Nuclear Option’ that only needs 51 votes instead of the 60 votes that is customary with filibuster! Does that also mean legislation that has blocked the minority to add their fair share of ‘things’ to House bills before being sent on to the Senate, and now eliminated by Speaker Pelosi with another ‘Radical Left’ Rule Change that she made at the beginning of this new session of Congress when she got rid of a long-standing House rule, known as “motion to recommit,” that permits the minority party to change legislation on the floor before a vote. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi feared that, without a rule change, the GOP could force Democrats to cast votes on controversial issues that may harm them politically in the next election, especially moderate members, given the rise of the party’s radical progressive wing.
HELLO!! Does anybody think that with the ‘Nuclear Option’ (Simple Majority), and Pelosi getting rid of the long-standing ‘Motion to recommit,’ which is you look at the 5th way to amend the Constitution that’s not mentioned in Constitution is by ‘Simple Customs,’ I think something like Motion to recommit and the ‘Nuclear Option being used is violating those simple customs that represent the founder’s basic foundation of working through bipartisanship that makes our Constitutional Republic what it’s supposed to be today!
How about we check out the next way to Amend the Constitution that isn’t mentioned in the Constitution, and that’s through ‘Federal Court Rulings!’:
This should be a simple way to show every American that can walk and chew gum at the same time just how choreographed and edited that these supposedly 5 ways to Amend the Constitution that are not only bogus, but as Nazi Propogandist Joseph Goebbels said:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
I know I’m beating the what should have been ‘dead horse’ if Congress were doing their job by rooting out the corruption and influencing of members of Congress by outside interests on our domestic and foreign policies because of the manipulation of the ‘Citizens United’ Supreme Court Decision by none other than, and again, Chief Justice Roberts whose had his fingers in every negative decision that hurt America and the Constitution’s intent and interpretive powers, or blocked every negative decision that would have short circuited every McConnell, Pelosi, Schumer, and the long gone Speaker Paul Ryan who gave anything and everything the Obama/Biden Administration needed to help destroy America from within before Pelosi’s 3rd Reign of terror as Speaker that she received after stealing the House back in 2018!
Before we move on from here I just wanted to point out this missed piece of information! I don’t know about you but every time I hear something about the ‘Radical Left,’ and that’s because they haven’t been my parents Democratic Party for at least the last 29 years ever since Bush 41 condemned America and the American people to a life of an unexceptional existence, which by the way if you recall is the same unexceptional existence that Obama announced to the world that America wasn’t on his first apology tour of the world after the American people fell for his lies about ‘Hope and Change,’ which we now know from his Vice President’s Joe Biden’s was and always has been ‘Bait and Switch’ after Communist China Stole the 2020 elections that Mitch McConnell called Joe Biden to congratulate him on his victory before any of the challenges that McConnell knew were coming were even filed!
The reason I’m bringing this up again is because Mitch McConnell, especially after hearing about the Pelosi and Schumer led Cabal, with Joe Biden and his unconstitutional Vice President Kamala Harris pushing to use the filibuster to pass this George Soros inspired New World Order ‘Radical and unconstitutional Agenda, that Mitch McConnell in 2020 allowed the ‘Dems’ to use the ‘Filibuster to short circuit anything President Trump wanted to further his MAGA Agenda 327 times to just 1 for the Republicans! Hmmm…… and it’s me right?
Now the real starter of all that we’ve lived through over the last 10 plus years started with Harry Reid, the original obstructionist and blocker of any and all legislation by either tabling it and not allow the Senate to even debate or vote on House passed bills, and then used the ‘Nuclear Option’ (Simple Majority of 51 votes with no filibuster or the customary 60 vote threshold to pass major legislation) to undermine the intent and interpretation of our founder’s belief in a government of the People, by the People and for the People’s winning formula that the world has both envied and admired from afar for the last 245 years!
The reason I’m bringing the Nuclear Option up for a second time with the ‘Federal Court Ruling’s way to Amend the Constitution is that Harry Reid used the ‘Nuclear Option’ to appoint Progressive judges to the lower courts to protect Obama’s anti-American exceptionalism Agenda when the Democrats lost the Majority of the Senate to the Republicans, but lets not forget with 20:20 hindsight that we now know it didn’t make a difference because Mitch McConnell continued on with Harry Reid’s obstruction and blocking of any legislation ways that would have helped America and the American People to be what President Trump’s agenda was pushing, and that’s to make America first and great again!
Does anybody out there now Believe that ‘Packing the Court’ wasn’t on the mind of these ‘New’ ways to amending the Constitution when they put out this bogus list that aren’t mentioned in the original document that we know today as the true Constitution’s intent and interpretation, and the reason why Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow the 4 plus challenges to the 2020 elections to be heard by the Supreme Court Justices, especially when President Trump’s 3 additions are ‘Original Constitutionalists’ that base all their decisions based on the written letter and intent and interpretation of the Constitution only!
The term ‘Democracy’ is the ‘Radical Left’s’ ‘Trojan Horse’ that they hope will lure the American People into a false sense of security and inclusion if they repeat the lie long enough and loud enough until it becomes the truth in the minds of their new base of illegals who don’t know the difference, but believe that they are finally going to get their shot at ‘Constitutional Guaranteed Rights’ and the ‘American dream,’ but at the end of that anticipated rainbow only getting the ‘Radical Left’s’ ‘Bait and Switch’ pot of that same Socialist ‘fools gold’ that they risked their lives to get away from!
Elimination of the filibuster, Packing the Court, killing our founder’s Electoral College, and needing to defund the police are all attempts to make the American People believe that by fighting for our Democracy it’s the same as fighting for America, when in fact it’s the complete opposite and goes against everything our that our founders created and the American people continued to fight for over the last 245 years!
There is a reason why our founders didn’t use the term ‘Democracy’ in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence…
‘Why There Is No Mention Of “Democracy” In The U.S. Constitution!’
By ALAN KEYES, former Assistant Secretary of State. (August 24, 2016)
I offer this piece in the hope that it might lead some readers to ponder the fact that the Democratic and Republican Parties are neither democratic nor republican. The forces that presently control them both mean to overturn the U.S. Constitution, once and for all.]
I often wonder at the fact that many people who claim to support the U.S. Constitution have utterly abandoned its key terms and provisions. One of the signs of that abandonment has been the use of the term “democracy” to describe the form of government established by the Constitution of the United States. Yet that term is nowhere used in our key founding documents—not in the Constitution, and not in the Declaration of Independence, which summarizes the Constitution’s premises.
The reason for this is simple. Democracy does not achieve what America’s Founders understood to be the essential purpose of constitutional government. James Madison epitomized their understanding in Federalist 51 when he wrote:
“Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit. In a society under the forms of which the stronger faction can readily unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy may as truly be said to reign as in a state of nature, where the weaker individual is not secured against the violence of the stronger; and as, in the latter state, even the stronger individuals are prompted, by the uncertainty of their condition, to submit to a government which may protect the weak as well as themselves; so, in the former state, will be the more powerful factions or parties be gradually induced, by a like motive, to wish for a government which will protect all parties, the weaker as well as the more powerful.”
The last phrase of Madison’s observation accurately reflects the goal that preoccupied America’s founding generation. It was to establish “a government which will protect all parties, the weaker as well as the more powerful.” These days the goal of protecting the weak from abuse by the more powerful instantly makes sense to most Americans. But many would wonder what sense it makes to assert that the more powerful require the help of government to protect from those who are weaker than they.
Doesn’t superior power assure that they can protect themselves? Madison’s reference to “the uncertainty of their condition” suggests the answer. Like Macbeth in Shakespeare’s play, even those who have attained superior power must say to themselves “To be thus is nothing, but to be safely thus.” Like the fastest gunmen of the Old West, they must be incessantly preoccupied with the prospect of confronting someone capable of defeating their prowess.
This constant anxiety interferes with the ability to enjoy the things they had imagined, in prospect, to be the fruits of their power. It takes the heart out of all the good things they imagined to be the fruits of greatness. Though the shrewd elitist of our day have studiously sought to distract people from it, this specter of uncertainty also haunts the people whenever, for a time, they succeed in gathering sufficient strength to defeat those who are otherwise capable of subduing them. “Democracy” is the term that refers to the sovereignty the many achieves at such times. At its Greek root, the word democracy literally refers to the strength people achieve by acting in solidarity with one another.
But archetypal situations familiar to us from stories of the “Old West” point to the difficulties and limits of such solidarity. A mob may sometimes overwhelm the gunman who would vanquish each of it members individually. But mob action depends on the strength of passion that inspires them to act as one. That common strength depends on the fact that someone among them has shown the ability and will to understand and communicate some purposeful passion to all the rest. That individual’s performance overcomes the fearful hesitation most individuals experience as they imagine themselves dying by the inerrant hand of the skillful gunman who commands them to desist or die.
With sufficient reflection, this imagined confrontation reveals the mutual vulnerability of the many and the few, however strong or weak they think themselves to be in relation to one another. A large mob can be faced down by a few capable individuals who execute an effective plan that takes advantage of their reputations. A few capable individuals can be defeated by a mob, imbued with passionate resolve by an apparently common purpose passionately communicated. The key on both sides lies not in relative numbers, but in whatever perfects the common will and purpose on which the deployment of their power depends.
But on all sides the uncertainty of superior power mars the prospect of enjoying its fruits. That enjoyment is thus a purpose understood and shared by all. But it is always out of reach, because no one fells they have sufficient power to prevent some greater power from imposing itself. Yet there is the prospect of a power superior to all—the power of the whole they might form if all acted together. If the many and the few, more or less powerful in any given circumstance, are inspired to unite in respect of a purpose that inspires them all, union represents the opportunity actually to enjoy the fruits the power of its component parts allows them to obtain.
At any given moment the possibility of this union of all reflects the distribution of power in that moment. It reflects the degree to which each and every individual depends, in some measure, on other individuals for the deployment of his power. And it depends on the variety of imagined fruits each individual hopes to enjoy as the result of that deployment. No matter the relative scarcity or abundance of material things, people will always be in competition for such imagined fruits. This is true because their relative importance depends less on what they are in fact than on what each individual imagines to be the satisfaction derived from possessing them.
But insofar as the uncertainty of power mars that prospective satisfaction, each and all of them will ascribe some degree of importance to reducing it. Insofar as the union of all has the power to achieve to do so, they will accept the terms on which that union can be achieved. The union will be held to represent their common good because it secures them the opportunity to derived greater enjoyment from the various goods its delimited terms allow them to pursue.
This opportunity, and the belongings it allows all to enjoy, are therefore aptly called public things (in the Latin, res publica). The form of government established to preserve these things is a Republic. This is the form of government actually mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. It is the form its Framers sought for the United States Government; which that government is, in turn, required to guarantee in each of the states.
Though in various ways it deploys the power of the majority, the Founders knew better than to mistake that term simply as a reference to superior numbers. It refers as well to the adaptable efficacy of power, which requires qualities of mind, heart and skill that cannot be precisely quantified, except in consequence of destructive experiences that destroy the happiness (peaceful enjoyment of one’s belongings) it is the ultimate purpose of good government to secure.
This purpose is, on the whole, the meaning of justice. To achieve it, both the will of the many and that of the powerful few must be subsumed under a constitution that preserves, limits and effectively represents them both. America’s Founders well understood the need for an authority that, on the whole, corresponds to justice; an authority that properly limits the will and power of both the many and the few. This they acknowledged to be the authority of their Creator, God, from which, as individuals, both derive their very being.
The unfolding tragedy of the American Republic is driven by the fact that the forces presently in control of America’s political life have abandoned respect for the authority of God, and the concept of justice predicated upon it. They have therefore abandoned the substantive aim of the republican form of government the Constitution requires. In the name of a “democracy” the Constitution never mentions, these forces are systematically corrupting the American people. They elaborate an alluring prospect of unlimited personal power, self-willed and self-contained. But once that form of “democratic” power has, in practice, replaced the republican institutions the U.S. Constitution ordains and establishes, those enticed by it will discover that their sovereignty has disappeared.
Too late, they will see that it has been replaced by the age-old form of oligarchic tyranny the U.S. Constitution was supposed to overturn. They will realize that there is no longer a republican party in the United States, or even a sincerely democratic party. Instead, there is one oligarchic clique, which temporarily encouraged the excesses of licentious democracy in order, at its end, to reassert the supremacy of their own.~~
PELOSI CAUGHT IN AN ACT OF SEDITION, CHANGING THE RULES TO PREVENT WHAT PROBABLY IS CLOSER TO 100 MILLION FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP THAN 75 MILLION AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY WITH THE 2020 ELECTIONS BEING PROVED TO HAVE BEEN FIXED DUE TO A CYBER ATTACK BY CHINA, AND AS A RESULT, NOW TRYING TO SILENCE THE REPUBLICANS SAY WHEN IT COMES TO ELECTION REFORM!
The Senate Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid started the Radical Left’s rule changing strategy when he used the ‘Nuclear Option’s’ simple majority to get Obamacare passed and to stuff the lower courts with Progressive Judges who unconstitutionally prevented the President of the United States from exercising his constitutional given powers of protecting America’s sovereignty and keeping the American people safe, which is something that President Elect Biden isn’t doing, and has no intentions of doing so!
I hope that you now fully understand that this one-sided power grab by these Pelosi and Schumer traitors have no intention of protecting any Americans ahead of protecting and financially aiding the rest of the world using American taxpayer dollars, especially China!
The definition of the Radical Left’s’ ‘Democracy, and the reason why the term Democracy is the message the Dems have been spewing for as long as I can remember, is to subliminally force feed the American people into believing that a simple majority is the only way that society on a whole can get their fair share of whatever agenda their pushing at the time, undermines the rights and common sense ideals of our founders and the reason why America was built by the people and for the people, but protects all those who lost any election with the guarantee of their constitutional rights always remaining intact!
For all of you hooked on the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media, and except their version of the truth, then obviously you have to be both dumb, deaf, and blind if you can’t see what’s happening under this still yet to be certified by Congress Administration Hoax, lies, and committed to making America last!
Pelosi and company are trying to force the term ‘Democracy’ down every American Citizen’s throats for one purpose and one purpose only, and that’s why they had to steal the House, the Senate, and the White House and that’s because they had to if they hoped to eliminate the attempted protection of the minority that lost the election in favor of the majority!
If you have any doubt in your mine that this election wasn’t stolen, then check out this article….
Please know that Facebook and Twitter are the only Social Media venues that calls MyPillow’s Mike Lindell’s video on China’s fixing the 2020 elections via a cyber-attack!
What the American people also need to know is that what’s happening in America today started back with Bush 41 with his signing on with the beginning stages of the United Nations Agenda 21! What’s also needed to be known is that our founders Constitutional ‘Checks and Balances,’ if adhered to by our elected officials and their appointments to the leadership roles of our DOJ, FBI, and CIA, would never would have allowed America’s sovereignty to be threatened or the American people to be literally under attack!
The ‘End Game’ of the Radical Left is to eliminate the constitution, eliminate the ‘Rule of Law, bypass the individual states rights, when it comes to voting, policing, education, and our military, especially the National Guard because they are here on American soil and not overseas fighting in foreign lands! They also need to get rid of the the American people’s Constitutional rights like the freedom of religion and speech (1st Amendment), the right to bear arms (2nd Amendment), the right to due process or the presumption of innocents, and the right to assemble using the ‘China Virus’ a.k.a., COVID-19 because they don’t want the American people to compare notes or share thoughts about what the Hell is happening to our country, OR asking each other about what are we going to do about it!
Killing the Electoral College, Harry Reid’s changing the rules of the Senate by getting rid of the filibuster and changing the way on how to pass legislation in the good old democratic way using the Radical Left’s claims that since they won the election that the opposition Republican Party, and their what’s probably 100 Million Americans if you take away all the fraud that Chief Justice Roberts refuses to let the other Justices of the Supreme Court to hear the case, and especially now after watching the corrupt Majority Leader of the Senate Chuck Schumer threaten the 2 original constitutionalist Justices with impeachment if they dare touch Roe v. Wade, and that all happened before the 3rd Original constitutionalist Amy Coney Barrett was added!
A DEMOCRACY:
The chief characteristic and distinguishing feature of a Democracy is: Rule by Omnipotent Majority.
In a Democracy, The Individual, and any group of Individuals composing any Minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of The Majority. It is a case of Majority-over-Man.
A REPUBLIC:
A Republic, on the other hand, has a quite different purpose and an entirely different form, or system, of government.
Its purpose is to control The Majority strictly, as well as all others among the people, primarily to protect The Individual’s God-given, unalienable rights and therefore for the protection of the rights of The Minority, of all minorities, and the liberties of people in general.
The definition of a Republic is: a constitutionally limited government of the representative type, created by a written Constitution–adopted by the people and changeable (from its original meaning) by them only by its amendment–with its powers divided between three separate Branches: Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Here the term “the people” means, of course, the electorate.
With the left killing of the Checks and Balances during the Obama Administration’s violating the constitution slugfest which was allowed because the corrupt leadership of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA intentionally turned a blind eye every time Obama violated the constitution, which again if you don’t understand what I’m talking about, then refresh or learn for the first time all that violating that the Obama Administration never was called on the carpet for, then check out this link!
The Unchecked by Republican WHIP/Senate Minority Leader/Senate Majority Leader/ and now Senate Minority Leader after doing such a great job of congratulating who at the time was President Elect Biden before, and that he knew were coming, challenges to the election that Chief Justice to the Supreme Court John Roberts refused to allow the Supreme Court to hear after the fact!
Hmmm, what did McConnell know when he congratulated Biden before the challenges to the election were even drawn up and presented! Hmmm, again!
With Pelosi changing the rules in the House again, with the first time just being a year ago why she said in order to have an inquiry into president Trump’s Phone call with a foreign leader where 13 people who were supposed to be listening couldn’t quite figure out what they heard, yeah right, and then again when the New 117th Congress was sworn in that only took a matter of days before they broke that oath to protect and defend the constitution by allowing themselves to attempt to impeach a duly elected President of the United States without granting him his the Constitutionally guaranteed due process and the presumption of innocents that is guaranteed and afforded to every American Citizen!
That rule change and why this article about why only Democrats can push for election reform is because Democrats have gotten rid of a long-standing House rule, known as “motion to recommit,” that permits the minority party to change legislation on the floor before a vote.
A Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial condemned the move, which the Democrats carried out this week as the majority party passed the rules that will govern the chamber for the next two years.
The editorial said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi feared that, without a rule change, the GOP could force Democrats to cast votes on controversial issues that may harm them politically in the next election, especially moderate members, given the rise of the party’s radical progressive wing.
The GOP never made a similar move when they controlled the majority, with Republican Rep. Tom Cole pointing out that “This is a right that has been guaranteed to the minority for well over a century. With today’s changes, the majority is seeking to silence views they are afraid of.”~~
If recall it was “Pelosi that vowed to keep minimum wage provision in House bill, Kamala Harris could act, and this was after the Senate’s chief parliamentarian ruled that a federal minimum wage hike should ‘NOT’ be included in the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package, but that seemed to do little to deter House Democrats from pursuing the plan — against impossible odds.
In a statement obtained by Fox News, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough’s decision “disappointing.” Pelosi, like most Democrats, insisted that the wage-hike provision be kept in the bill and said it would “remain in the American Rescue Plan on the Floor tomorrow.”
Vice President Harris, as president of the Senate, can override the parliamentarian’s ruling, but the move is considered unlikely. Ron Klain, President Biden’s chief of staff, said in an interview this week that a Harris override was “not something we would do.”
MacDonough’s decision was a devastating blow by the chamber’s nonpartisan arbiter to the Democrat cause. Senate Democrats wanted to avoid having to deal with a Republican filibuster and employ a process called budget reconciliation. Under the process, Democrats would be able to pass the bill in the Senate with a simple majority. But budget reconciliation comes with additional rules, including what provisions can be added to these bills.
The ‘End Game’ fills in the blanks on how America got to where we are starting back in 1992 with the Signing of the United Nations Agenda 21 through all the Robert Mueller years that started with Bush 41, the next 3 Administrations, Obama’s ‘Non-Scandals.’ the United Nations role, the corrupt FBI, DOJ, and CIA, the Obama economy lies, the Obama’s Administrations list of Constitutional violations, being a Natural Born Citizen, George Soros’s history, McConnell and Ryan’s back stabbing of President Trump, Chief Justice Roberts, Obama’s disdain for America’s military, the Climate Change Hoax, the China Virus’s/COVID-19’s history from it’s inception, the 1st Impeachment trial, Immigration, Ukraine, Joe Biden and son’s Quid Pro Quo and more like our children’s Common Core education, and a lot more… Book and Articles Information can be found by clicking this link: The ‘End Game’ Updates