There is one thing you should know, and that is once you understand that the ‘New World Order’ is a given, is inevitable, and that you can take it to the bank when it comes to the future of the world, then everything else you read by me from here on out is based on that premise! One more thing that you should also remember is that the Mainstream Media, a.k.a. the ‘Deep State’ run ‘Paid to Report’ Mainstream Media, has been in the bag from the first day that President Obama took office back in 2008!
The Obama Administrations carefully placed the last 4 Administrations corrupt leadership of their FBI, DOJ, and CIA that were appointed, but not elected to office, and for the sole purpose of protecting Ex-President Obama against any push back that might have prevented Obama’s ‘Pen and Phone’ declaration that he planned to use to make an end run around our Constitution, ‘Rule of Law,’ and the ‘Will’ of the American people!
If you hadn’t noticed this yet about my articles, then you haven’t noticed that I rely a lot on common sense and the preponderance of the evidence! Now when it comes which version of the truth should reign supreme, I go with my conclusion, and not the Mainstream Media’s. I have found that their version is based on their agenda and how they chose to interpret the facts, and then how they intend to use those facts when protecting the American people from what they have determined is not in the best interest of the American people, but what they think the American people have the right hear in order to accomplish their ultimate goal of creating a New World Order!
The only reason these Freshman members of the House are able to proclaim their outrageous personal beliefs and accusations about America’s past, is that they want to see how far they can get away with pushing the edge of the envelope by moving ideologically further and further to the left every time a new candidate announces that they’re also running for the position of President of the United States!
Now the reason they’re doing this pushing is because they believe they know how they’re going to win the 2020 elections because they intend to mirror exactly how California changed the rules on voting and how the votes are counted that resulted in the Dems taking back the House with Pelosi taking back the gavel as the Speaker of the House for a second time!
When it comes to the Party of ‘Marx’ the only thing I have to say is “How much further left can they go,” but as long as they think that the American people are asleep at the wheel, they’ll continue to attack our founder’s version of governance that has been successful for close to 250 years, and keep doing it because they know that they have the ‘Deep State’ Mainstream Media’s protecting their non-existent sources that over the years they’ve used to create a ‘false’ narrative about this outsider non-politician President who could have retired and done anything he wanted and where ever he wanted to do it, but when he chose to fight for the American people and their Constitution, and do it right here on American soil, he opened up a version of Pandora’s Box that no one could have ever predicted!
How tired are you of the ‘Left’ when they keep recycling the same false accusations that have been debunked more then once before, and how tired are you of the ‘Left’s’ perceived proclamations of what they believe to be the truth about the state of the Union when in reality they couldn’t be any further from the truth, and by a long shot! Never fear though because I’ve been on the sideline taking notes for at least the last 12 years, so when I hear candidates for the 2020 elections like ‘Pocahontas,’ a.k.a. Elizabeth Warren, spew these lies about stealing seats on the Supreme Court, and than stating that the last Justice to the Supreme Court who’s replacing exiting Socialist Democratic Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, was basically stolen at best, but closer to a crime punishable by death, and then I think to myself that it’s time to set the record straight!
If there is anything you should be learning about America’s New Socialist Party, a.k.a. the once Traditional, Progressive, and now the Democratic Socialist Party, is that all three version have a tendency to lie, and because President Trump beat ‘Crooked’ Hillary Clinton in a Electoral College landslide that created a delayed of the Pelosi and Schumer led Dems with their plans to create a ‘One Size Fits All’ Socialist Society that should have been completed 12 years that takes us up to 2030, which by coincidence just happens to be the same target date as is the United Nation’s Agenda 21, the original end game date for the ‘Paris Accord,’ and the end of the world proclamations of both AOC and now Cory Booker who predicted the world will be coming to an end because of ‘Climate Change if nothing is done!
When it comes to the New World Order, the Dems will always follow their ‘End justifies the means’ rallying cry until death do they part, and the reason they have to do that is because that’s all they got! The Dems have lost favor with American electorate because this outsider non-politician President is doing what he promised he would do, but unlike the previous Administrations who blew smoke up everyone’s asses to get elected, and then kicked whatever problems they had down the road for the next Administration, who also decided to do nothing to get elected by living up to his or her promises, and kick that same can down the road again!
Once the Dems went for Obama’s Socialist agenda we’ve witnessed the insanity taking over the heart and soul of what use to be a political Party that American could be proud of that cared about America’s sovereignty and the safety of the American people, and with that inability to come up with new ideas that their base could get behind, decided to go out on their own without using our founder’s checks and balances and did what they thought was right without bothering to check with the American people first, which by the way is why we are where we are today, and why the ‘Left’ is trying to move further Left because they decided that one for all, and all for one, and that included a nation with other nations where ‘one size fits all,’ and individual rights can’t survive in a nation that Dems believe is best for the world!
President Trump has delivered on most if not all of his promises in a big way, but on top of that undoing just about everything that Obama unconstitutionally and illegally did to destroy America from within, and I contend that this is why the Dems have been forced, in order to stay relevant when it comes to the history of America when looking back generations from now, and as a result of their inability to come with the same kind of ideas that are founders did to make this country one of the best in the history of the world, have decided that their only path into the future will have to be one that needs to be gravitating to catering to unvetted illegals immigrants and refugees to support their Socialist agenda.
Voter fraud worked for Pelosi taking back the House, and accomplishing that by doing nothing for two years for the American people other than just resisting and obstruction anything and everything that neither the Constitution or this outsider non-politician, that beat Hillary in the 2016, wants to do to protect and defend America, or has the slightest inkling to make America great again!
The new issues coming from the Socialist Democratic Party over the last couple of days is lowering the voting age 16, and I don’t know about you, but when I was that age and still under my parents’ roof, I was in High School when ‘Free’ would have sounded pretty dam good to me! Next, we have ‘Pocahontas’ doing what all these newbie Democrats seem to be doing these days, and that’s relaying information that is 100% inaccurate, and when it comes to her claims of the Republicans stealing a Supreme Court Seat by not having a hearing with Judge Garland. Warren stated it was the Republicans who got rid of the filibuster when seating both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, but where she’s wrong is that it was Harry Reid who set Precedent when he changed the rules in the Senate to get Obamacare Passed:
SO HOW DID OBAMACARE BECOME A LAW? IT’S ACTUALLY PRETTY INTERESTING.
If you recall, the Democrats in the House couldn’t pass their version of a Healthcare law. Because all revenue bills have to originate in the House of Representatives, the Senate found a bill that met those qualifications: HR3590, a military housing bill. They took out essentially all of the wording of it and turned it into the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obamacare. It gets better. The Senate at that time had 60 Democrats, just enough to pass Obamacare.
After the bill passed the Senate, the Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy died. In his place, Massachusetts elected Republican Scott Brown. That meant that, if the House made any changes to the bill, the Senate wouldn’t have the necessary number of votes to pass the corrected bill, since they knew no Republicans would vote for Obamacare. So, they made a deal with the Democrat‐controlled House of Representatives: the House would pass the Senate bill without any changes, IF the Senate agreed to pass a separate bill by the House that made changes to the Senate version of Obamacare. This second bill was called the Reconciliation Act of 2010.
It made a bunch of detail changes and added some things. So, the House passed PPACA, the Senate bill, as well as their Reconciliation Act. So now PPACA was ready for the President to sign, but the Senate still needed to pass the Reconciliation Act from the House. Confused yet?
Now, remember that the Senate only had 59 votes to pass the Reconciliation Act since Republican Scott Brown replaced Democrat Ted Kennedy. In order to pass the Reconciliation Act, therefore, the Democrats in the Senate DECIDED TO CHANGE THE RULES!
They declared that they could use the “Reconciliation Rule”—this is a different “reconciliation” than the House bill now. This rule was only used for budget item approval, so that budget items could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60. This rule was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare.
Too bad… they used it anyway. So then both of the “Acts” passed both houses of Congress and were then signed by President Obama.
ALL DONE BY DEMOCRATS WITHOUT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT. TO QUOTE DEMOCRAT REP. ALCEE HASTINGS OF THE HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE DURING THE BILL PROCESS:
“WE’RE MAKING UP THE RULES AS WE GO ALONG” THEY CERTAINLY COULDN’T HAVE MADE THIS LAW WITHOUT IT.
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT?????
Now when it comes to the Supreme Court vacated seat and using the nuclear option (simple majority instead of the 60-vote threshold, filibuster possible) know that it was Chuck-e Schumer when Bush 43’ was in office that:
Chuck Schumer in 2007: Senate Should Block Supreme Court Nominees for 18 Months
In a development that’s likely to cause fits for President Barack Obama, the Senate Democrats’ next leader, Charles Schumer, told a 2007 audience — on video — that he wanted to block any Supreme Court nominations for the last 18 months of President George W. Bush’s presidency.
That’s seven months longer than the amount of time remaining to Obama’s presidency.
The political situation in 2007 was a mirror image of the current face-off created by Justice Antonin Scalia’s unexpected death and Anthony Kennedy’s recent retirement. Bush was in his second term in the White House, and the Democrats had retaken the Senate in the 2006 midterm elections. The incumbent president had already made two Supreme Court appointments, John Roberts and Samuel Alito.
Schumer’s audience was the American Constitution Society (ACS), a left-wing legal organization. The society was founded in an effort to limit the impact that the Federalist Society was having on promoting conservative legal principles in American law schools, which are notoriously liberal.
On July 27, 2007, Schumer told his ACS audience:
How do we apply the lessons we learned from Roberts and Alito to be the next nominee, especially if—God forbid—there is another vacancy under this president? … [F]or the rest of this president’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this president and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings—with respect to the Supreme Court, at least—I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances.
Schumer replaced Harry Reid, the number one obstructionist of all time in the Senate, as the Democrats’ leader in the Senate when Reid retired.
No word yet from Schumer as to why it is acceptable for Democrats to not act on a Republican nomination to the Supreme Court for 18 months, but it is unacceptable for Republicans to not act on a Democratic nomination for 11 months.
Now if you think that’s not bad enough, what about the supposedly centrist Judge Garland who would evaluate anything before him through bipartisan eyes and then interpret everything that comes before him by our founder’s Constitution as written. What followed was the Mainstream Media praising the selection, but within days corrected their positive overzealous findings about this above-board bipartisan candidate for the Supreme Court….
Judge Garland and the Left’s Disdain for Truth!
~~By Dennis Prager
By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.
The mainstream media — that is, the liberal media — share all the views and characteristics of the left. Among these is the left’s view of truth. There are honest individuals with left-wing views, and dishonest individuals on the right. But truth is not a leftist value. Everything the left believes in is more important than truth: social justice, economic equality, reducing carbon emissions, expanding the power of the state, battling sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, and above these, destroying its conservative opposition.
The media’s coverage of President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court should serve as one of the most blatant examples of both the left-wing orientation of the news media and their willingness to play with truth.
On March 16, the day after Garland’s nomination, every major mainstream news outlet, both print and electronic, depicted the judge as a centrist.
The first sentence of The New York Times front page read: “WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday nominated Merrick B. Garland to be the nation’s 113th Supreme Court justice, choosing a centrist appellate judge.”
Similarly, the Los Angeles Times front-page headline said: “Obama’s choice of popular centrist Merrick Garland for Supreme Court puts GOP to the test.”
Another headline, seen in the Washington Post, read: “Merrick Garland’s instinct for the middle could put him in the court’s most influential spot.” That same day, the Post published a second article mentioning how “Garland’s deep resume and centrist reputation appear to have positioned him well to earn the president’s nod.”
Two days later, the Los Angeles Times featured a news analysis on its front page, in which a reporter wrote that Garland may be “the most moderate Supreme Court nominee anyone could expect from a Democratic president.” The reporter also calls Garland “a superbly qualified judge with a cautious, centrist record.”
There is no truth to any of these reports — something easily proved by both Judge Garland’s decisions and, amazingly, by the newspapers’ reports themselves.
Take the Los Angeles Times’ front-page “news analysis,” for example. After describing the judge as a moderate and centrist, the LA Times reporter writes:
“If the late Justice Antonin Scalia, a staunch conservative, is replaced by a moderate-to-liberal Justice Garland, the court would tip to the left on several key issues, like abortion, affirmative action, the death penalty, gun control, campaign spending, immigration and environmental protection.”
In other words, the very same author who describes Garland as a centrist believes that Garland votes left on essentially every major issue confronting the nation and the Supreme Court.
Additionally, that very same day The New York Times headlined that Garland is a centrist, it published an article on the nomination noting that “If Judge Garland is confirmed, he could tip the ideological balance to create the most liberal Supreme Court in 50 years.”
In reviewing Garland’s decisions, this Times piece placed Judge Garland to the left of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, way to the left of Justice Stephen Breyer and minimally to the right of Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg.
By their own accounts, the liberal media lied in describing Garland as a centrist.
And the more research one does, the bigger this lie appears.
In a column in The Wall Street Journal, Juanita Duggan, President and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business, wrote that Garland is so anti-small business and so pro-big labor, that “This is the first time in the NFIB’s 73-year-history that we will weigh in on a Supreme Court nominee.”
What worries the NFIB, she explains, is that “in 16 major labor decisions of Judge Garland’s that we examined, he ruled 16-0 in favor of the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board).”
Elsewhere in the Journal, the editorial board wrote that they can’t think of a single issue on which Garland would vote differently from the four liberal Justices that already sit on the bench.
Tom Goldstein wrote in the SCOTUSblog that Garland favors deferring to the decision-makers in agencies. “In a dozen close cases in which the court divided, he sided with the agency every time.”
Another source reads that “Judge Garland would be a reliable fifth vote on these legal issues.”
Those are all the fundamental issues that divide the left from the right.
So, the entire left is lying about Judge Garland, who, for the record, seems like a truly decent man who possesses a first-class mind. They do so because getting a fifth left-wing vote and weakening the Republicans is far more important than truth.
And believe it or not, there is an even worse lesson here, namely the media’s effectiveness in saturating society with its mendacious version of reality. Unless an American makes the effort to study the issue — and most do not — they take the news media’s version as truth. The terrible lesson, which has been affirmed time and time again since the 1960’s, is that a free society can experience brainwashing as effectively as a totalitarian state.
The Mainstream Media has refused to inform the American people about whatever they think might cast a shadow over anything the Democrats do, but rain on the parade for anyone that supports this President or believes what the Constitution represents and now wanting to do away with the Electoral College because the 3 Million illegals that voted in California in 2016, and then again to flip 6 Republican House seats that were won by Republicans on election day, but due to the new changes to the California’s voting laws, were able to flip all 6 of those seats to Democrats within the 2 weeks after the election! If you missed how that happened, let me refresh your memory….
New York and other ‘Blue States’ will be following in California’s footsteps because they were able to witness the 12 years of success in developing a system of voter fraud that finally worked in California in the 2018 Midterms, and doing it with the help of George Soros and other outside interests who had no problem cooking the books and changing their individual states voter laws, but on top of that doing it without passing bipartisan legislation that would ensure the safety and protection of America’s sovereignty that the American people!
What’s comes next in these ‘Blue’ States is exactly what California does, and that’s automatically registering illegals to vote, and then changing the election laws before the 2020 elections while illegals, as they also did in California, fill out voter registration cards in the names of the dead who haven’t been removed from the voter rolls!
Trump’s Committee on looking into Voter Fraud had to be disbanded due to the lack of cooperation coming from these ‘Blue States, and with the Dems taking back the House in the 2018 Midterms using a platform of obstructing and resisting anything that might make America great, refusing to work through bipartisanship on the 2016 peoples electoral College Mandate that was automatically declared due to the results of the 2016 Presidential elections that now President Trump won in a unprecedented Electoral College landslide over Hillary Clinton, and based on his platform of ‘Making America First and Great Again!’
My biggest fear is that the Republicans hasn’t gravitated toward the possibility of putting forth legislation before the 2020 election that would implement some kind of mandatory Federal Photo Voter ID Law, but on top of that, haven’t even mentioned the possibility that there is a problem at all! It’s beyond my comprehension to think that with an unknown number of illegals in the country, that this wouldn’t be a top priority?
The most recent proof that the Democrats used voter fraud in the 2018 Midterms happened in Pelosi’s state of California when 6 Republican House seats that were won by Republicans on election day were all reversed within the next two weeks due to the 5 million absentee ballots that were allowed to be counted if postmarked by election day and received within 3 business day of election day, which equals 40% of the total votes cast in California!
Another ‘new’ twist to the California voting rules is that absentee ballots no longer had to be delivered by a family member as before, but now by anyone! Oh, did I forget to mention that Nancy Pelosi needed 216 House votes to be the speaker, and just happen to get an extra four, and not the 6 that were stolen away from Republicans in California! The Mainstream Media when they had the chance to right their credibility ship failed again, and failed because they didn’t bother to report that Pelosi got the 216 votes needed to take back the Speaker-ship with 220 votes, and got those 6 votes needed to be speaker of the House from the Republican House seats that were won on election day, but all reversed because of the new rules in the voting process in California, and I guarantee you in additional ‘blue States’ by the time the 2020 Presidential elections comes to town!
The only platform that Dems intend to roll out for the 2020 Presidential election has nothing to do with America or its people, and how do we know this, Well just think about how America would look like today if Hillary would had won. Does anybody think that the taxes for individuals and the Corporations that employ Americans would have been lowered, does anybody think that the smothering regulations that were forcing our American made companies, along with their Intellectual Property, out of the country for the benefit and redistribution of America’s wealth, assets, and know how, but not to benefit American workers or America’s bottom line GDP, but to nations around the world, for the benefit of the world’s bottom line!