Bloomberg calls for closing all coal-fired power plants to combat climate change
By Paul Steinhauser
As the Pelosi led Progressive left continues to separate the American taxpayer from their money, and con the younger generations into believing that it’s America that’s the biggest perpetrator of was once called ‘Global Warming,’ know that now that it’s 2020 that nothing is going to change, especially when you have Bloomberg attempting to pull off the same ‘Climate Change’ hoax wool over the American peoples eyes!
For all of you don’t know why the Dem’s call it ‘Climate Change’ instead of what used to be called ‘Global Warming’ was due to the fact that the actual temperature of Earth has gone down, and the reason for the new ‘con’ to be called to ‘Climate Change!’ Which if you didn’t know it before now includes anything and everything that’s adverse to anything that happens weather wise to the climate, a.k.a. ‘Mother Nature!’ If you still believe that ‘Climate Change’ is caused by people and not forces beyond our control, than know that you are now one of those people that know you can ‘Fix Stupid’ by just checking out the facts laid out in this article’s link…..
‘The Dem’s ‘Paris Accord,’ ‘New Green Deal,’ and ‘The Sky is Falling’ Lies!’
Americans and the rest of the world are littering ‘Pigs’ that don’t seem to understand that Plastic is the real but not only killer of ‘Mother Nature’s’ gifts to humanity! When it comes to every other excuse the ‘Left’ attempts to give the American taxpayer to separate them from their money and/or the information that’s being withheld from our next generation who will be the future leaders of America, we can only hope that this made ‘ First and Great Again’ country will still be here to lead!
What the American people have to understand is that we are the only country left with taxpayer money that Obama targeted to be used to fund the ‘Paris Accord’ lofty world’s Climate Change goals that they’ve all promised but failed to deliver on, and now according to AOC and those goals not being obtained, we will experience the world coming to an end in just another 12 years!
If you haven’t noticed the coincidence yet then let me help you out! This particular time line just happens to be to 2030, the same end of the world date of when the United Nations ‘Agenda 21’s Globalist based U.N. New World Order is suppose to be up and running! Now isn’t that just amazing how that works…?
jonathanepmoore.com article to follow….
Climate Change: When Push Comes to ‘Shove-ling’ Sh*t!
‘Two years ago the question was are there 1,600 new coal-fired power plants being constructed today?‘
By Matthew Digby , Minh Do on Friday, September 20th, 2019 a
Two years ago, there was a study out saying there were 1,600 new coal-fired power plants being constructed around the world, but not in America today!
“I’m going to jump in here to not only add my two cents to this climate hoax shake down, but to plant a little seed in the minds of every American before the 2020 Presidential election again is clouded by the lies of the Pelosi led by in lock step Climate Change Gestapo, that’s being backed by George Soros!
As you read on you’ll see that it’s not America that all these Trillions of dollars are needed to fight ‘Climate Change,’ but all the other countries that these Progressive Dems have decided to spend America’s taxpayer’s money on! The goal is to remove President Trump from office before the election because these elitist Dems can’t trust the American people to do the right thing after they elected Trump in 2016, and can’t trust the American people to spend their own taxpayer dollars on what the Dems believe it should be spent on!
The article attributed this data to the Global Coal Plant Tracker, portal published by the Global Energy Monitor (GEM). This group, founded in 2007, has board members from such environmental groups as Clean Energy Action, Greenpeace, and the Rain forest Action Network. (The group did not respond to an inquiry for this article.)
As it turns out, the number on the site today is lower.
The tracker classifies coal-fired units as being under one of the following categories: announced, cancelled, under construction, mothballed, operating, permitted, pre-permit stage, retired, and shelved. So we looked at the figures using a few combinations of these categories.
There are 458 units currently under construction, according to the tracker — well below the 1,600 Roberts cited.
If you add in those in the permitted or pre-permit stage, the number increases to 903. This number includes plants seeking environmental approvals and other developmental steps, according to the GEM website.
Even if you add in those that are “announced” — which does not really qualify as being “under construction” — it brings the number up to only 1,160. That’s more than one-quarter lower than the figure Roberts cited.
(None of these are in the United States!)
Again, Where are these Trillions of Taxpayer dollars that AOC and others say they need for their green agenda going to be spent?
Kelly Sims Gallagher, director of the Climate Policy Lab at Tufts University, told PolitiFact that other sources of data indicate declining interest in coal-fired power plants.
The International Energy Agency, a Paris-based international organization, found that final investment decisions for new coal power plants have declined steadily between 2015 and 2018.
Study: U.S. Leads World in Reducing CO2 Emissions, While Paris Accord Nations Break Promises
By James Barrett
DailyWire.com
Despite obviously hating the environment and doing everything we can to bring about its fiery destruction, including pulling out of the Paris Agreement on climate change last year, the United States has miraculously managed to do pretty well in curbing CO2. In fact, the anti-environment USA is doing better than any other country that signed the accord, including all of Europe and our neighbor to the north.
In a piece for The Washington Times, Heritage Foundation senior fellow Stephen Moore points to recent data showing that despite all the condemnation of the U.S. from other self-styled pro-environment countries, America is doing the most to curb carbon emissions.
One of the studies Moore cites is BP’s new “Statistical Review of World Energy,” which notes that the U.S. led the world in carbon emissions declines in 2017, the ninth time it’s done so this century:
Declines were led by the US (-0.5%). This is the ninth time in this century that the US has had the largest decline in emissions in the world. This also was the third consecutive year that emissions in the US declined, though the fall was the smallest over the last three years.
Carbon emissions from energy use from the US are the lowest since 1992, the year that the UNFCCC came into existence. The next largest decline was in Ukraine (-10.1%).
America’s -0.5% reduction is particularly impressive in light of our nearly 3% economic growth in 2017. “The major reason for the reduced pollution levels is the shale oil and gas revolution that is transitioning the world to cheap and clean natural gas for electric power generation,” Moore writes.
Moore notes that America was able to make this progress despite never signing the Kyoto Protocol, never enacting a carbon tax, refusing to impose a “cap and trade” carbon emission program, and “that environmental villain Donald Trump pull[ing] America out of the Paris climate accord.”
So America is doing pretty well on its own. But how’s Europe doing? Not great overall. BP’s study found that European Union emissions were up overall (1.5%), “with just Spain accounting for 44% of the increase in EU emissions.” The UK and Denmark, however, did report their lowest carbon emissions yet, though still not matching the U.S.
As ‘The Daily Wire’s’ Emily Zanotti previously noted of the report’s findings, “Canada, Spain, the European Union, and China — all signatories to the infamous Paris Climate Accords negotiated by the United Nations — saw significant increases in carbon dioxide emissions. China released 120 million more tons of carbon dioxide into the air in 2017 than in 2016. The EU made up for America’s decline, releasing 40 million more tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.”
As the Pelosi led Progressive left continues to separate the American taxpayer and con the younger generations after 9/11 to believe it’s America that’s the biggest perpetrator of was once called ‘Global Warming,’ but because that fact has been debunked the narrative has been changed to ‘Climate Change!’
Which if you didn’t know it before now includes anything and everything that’s adverse to anything that happens weather wise to the climate, a.k.a. ‘Mother Nature,’ than just know that you are one of those people that are now included in the saying that “You can’t fix stupid!”
The worst emissions offenders were China and India. Here’s more from BP’s report (formatting adjusted):
The largest increase in carbon emissions in 2017 came from China (1.6%), a reversal from the past three years when the largest increases in emissions came from India. China’s emissions in 2017 were 0.3% higher than the previous peak in 2014. China has had the world’s largest increments in carbon emission every year this century except in four years – 2000 and between 2014-16. The next highest increment came from India where emissions rose by 4.4%, though lower than its 10-year average (6% p.a.). Together, China and India accounted for nearly half of the increase in global carbon emissions.
India’s increase in emissions more than doubles the U.S.’s reduction in 2017, while China produces some 28% of the world’s CO2 emissions, the Institute for Energy Research found.
Arguing that Trump was right to pull out of the accord, Moore provides data showing that “nearly every nation that signed on to the Paris Accord and has admonished America for not getting in, has already broken its promises.”
Not a single EU nation is within 80 percent of its respective target for emission reduction, according to Climate Action Network Europe (CANE). In its official EU report, CANE said “All EU countries are failing to increase their climate action in line with the Paris Agreement goal.” All but five countries aren’t even at 50 percent of their current targets.
President Trump might be a little hard to take and just a little rough around the edges, but for being a first time politician, it seems that his work ethic and his experience is allowing him to accomplish what he’s promised the American people he would, but with the obstructionists and resisters on the left needing to exchange progressives for moderates, or just crossing over to help this President make America first and great again in the 2018 Midterm election, which is something I’ve never witnessed in a ‘Real’ Democratic Politician since Obama hijacked the Party. Progressive Democrats still believe in Obama’s narrative of doing what’s best for the world, but never what’s best for America and its people!
CHINA AND INDIA PARIS ACCORD
I don’t know if you missed this information when it wasn’t freely relayed to you voluntarily, like they always do! but when Ex-President Obama took a trip to China to speak with President Xi Jinping, and then India’s Prime minister Narendra Modi, I immediately put the connection together and realized that the ex-President of the United States has been cleared to go back and explain why the Paris Accord commitment of American taxpayer funds was not going to happen!
How is it possible that an Ex-President is able to represent America in discussions pertaining to Climate control after President Trump already nixed the Paris Accord deal that would put taxpayers on the hook for startup and other costs to get his ‘green’ agenda up and running, while giving the two biggest violators of pollution, India and China who still burn coal, a free pass, both financially and regulation wise until the year 2030!
The bottom line here is that the American taxpayer that already have a debt of $22 Trillion, will be on the hook to fund the Paris Accord startup and maintaining the overhead that the Congress never approved, just like in the same way Obama funded the flood of unvetted illegal immigrants and refugees for their vote that also wasn’t approved by Congress, but would still be on the hook until the 2030 deadline while the American taxpayer’s money was continuing to be spent on what they want to spend your money on because America’s deplorables have no clue about what’s more important to the good of the world instead of what’s important to you and your family!
Back to the China and India connection and what caused my bell to go off?
I got it, and what I got is the ‘Paris Accord’ that President Trump so wisely pulled the plug on, is that China and India had the most to lose when President Trump pulled that plug? China and India are the ones to lose the most when it came to financial aid and exempting them from the strict regulations that were required of other countries including the United States! Is it a Coincidence that Ex-President Obama just happened to be visiting the two countries Obama let slide when it came to the financial commitment, and the goal-oriented CO2 restrictions and regulations that were imposed to keep the world safe from the major polluters of the world!
Trump said the deal, drawn up during the Obama administration, was “very unfair” to the United States, and did not pose strict enough restrictions on India and China. “For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years – 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. Not us. India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples. But the bottom line is that the Paris accord is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States.”
What Trump Said About India, China When Announcing the US’s Exit From the Paris Climate Deal
Donald Trump said the global accord was “partial” to India and China.
“China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So, we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of it: India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe can continue construction of coal plants,” he said.
The Paris Accord is a BAD deal for Americans, and President Trumps’ action to withdraw from the Agreement is keeping his campaign promise to put American workers first. The Accord was negotiated poorly by the Obama Administration and signed out of desperation. It front loads costs on the American people to the detriment of our economy and job growth while extracting meaningless commitments from the world’s top global emitters, like China. The U.S. is already leading the world in energy production and doesn’t need a bad deal that will harm American workers.
UNDERMINES U.S. Competitiveness and Jobs
• According to a study by NERA Consulting, meeting the Obama Administration’s requirements in the Paris Accord would cost the U.S. economy nearly $3 trillion over the next several decades.
• By 2040, our economy would lose 6.5 million industrial sector jobs – including 3.1 million manufacturing sector jobs
• It would effectively decapitate our coal industry, which now supplies about one-third of our electric power
The deal was negotiated BADLY, and extracts meaningless commitments from the world’s top polluters
• The Obama-negotiated Accord imposes unrealistic targets on the U.S. for reducing our carbon emissions, while giving countries like China a free pass for years to come.
• Under the Accord, China will increase emissions until 2030
The U.S. is ALREADY a Clean Energy and Oil & Gas Energy Leader; we can reduce our emissions and continue to produce American energy without the Paris Accord
• America has already reduced its carbon-dioxide emissions dramatically.
• Since 2006, CO2 emissions have declined by 12 percent, and are expected to continue to decline.
• According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. is the leader in oil & gas production.
The agreement funds a UN Climate Slush Fund underwritten by American taxpayers
• President Obama committed $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund – which is about 30 percent of the initial funding – without authorization from Congress
• With $20 trillion in debt, the U.S. taxpayers should not be paying to subsidize other countries’ energy needs.
The deal also accomplishes LITTLE for the climate
• According to researchers at MIT, if all member nations met their obligations, the impact on the climate would be negligible. The impacts have been estimated to be likely to reduce global temperature rise by less than .2 degrees Celsius in 2100.
